L'unité mobile de télémédecine ou unité médicale phygitale, un nouveau vecteur de prise en charge des soins non programmés en médecine générale, permet-elle de diminuer le recours au SAU (service d'accueil des urgences) ?

Résumé Introduction En partenariat avec l'Association SAUVlife (unité mobile de télémédecine) « phygital » et le SAMU 50, l'UMT où une unité phygitale a été déployée dans la Manche destinée à des patients âgés et/ou dépendants pour lesquels l'accès aux soins est rendu difficile par la carence de médecin traitant et de la diminution des visites à domicile. Ce nouveau vecteur pourrait être une alternative au recours aux urgences hospitalières. Méthode Nous avons réalisé une étude observationnelle rétrospective monocentrique de l'activité de l'UMT du 1er janvier au 30 juin 2021 au sein du service du SAMU 50 au CH Saint-Lô. Après régulation médicale, les patients ne relevant pas d'une urgence vitale pouvaient bénéficier d'une intervention de l'UMT. Résultats L'UMT est intervenue 681 fois. Au décours, 65,6 % de patients ont pu être laissés sur place. Cette unité phygitale a réalisé 621 téléconsultations permettant à 414 patients (66,7 %) de rester chez eux et 199 patients (32 %) d'être transportés vers un SAU. Ceux transportés étaient significativement plus âgés avec un âge moyen de 71,26 ans (p<0,001). Les interventions ont duré 1h27 en moyenne. Discussion Cette expérimentation est inédite dans le cadre de l'urgence. Cet outil semble répondre à la carence d'offre de soins du département. Son utilisation dans le cadre de la pandémie de COVID-19 est probante et permet par ses prises en charge à domicile une limitation des transmissions virales. Toutefois, les interventions sont longues et l'utilisation de l'UMT peut être optimisée tant sur le temps d'intervention que sur le nombre réalisé par jour. Conclusion L'unité mobile de télémédecine est un vrai apport en l'absence de médecins généralistes pour réaliser des visites à domicile de soins non programmés d'autant plus dans un contexte épidémique où elle limite le recours aux urgences et in fine la transmission des agents infectieux. Summary Introduction In partnership with SAUVlife volunteers and SAMU 50, a remote consultation mobile unit (UMT) was deployed in the Manche department of France, targeting elderly and dependent patients where access to care is difficult due to the lack of a general practitioner and the decrease of home visits. This new vector could be an alternative to the use of emergency rooms. Method We performed a monocentric retrospective observational study of the activity of the UMT from January 1 to June 30, 2021 within the SAMU 50 at the Saint-Lô Hospital. After initial medical regulation, the patients without a vital emergency could benefit from an intervention of the UMT. Results The UMT intervened 681 times. At the end of the intervention, 65.6% of the patients could be left on site. The phygital unit performed 621 teleconsultations allowing 414 patients (66.7%) to remain at home and 199 patients (32%) to be transported to an emergency room. Those transported were significantly older with an average age of 71.26years (P<0.001). The interventions lasted an average of 1hour and 27minutes. Discussion This experiment is new in the emergency context. This tool seems to respond to the lack of ambulatory care in the department. Its use in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic is convincing and allows for the limitation of viral transmissions through home care. However, the interventions are long and the use of the UMT can be optimized both in terms of intervention time and the number of interventions performed per day. Conclusion The mobile telemedicine unit is a real contribution in the absence of general practitioners, to carry out unscheduled home visits. Even more in an epidemic context where it limits the use of emergency rooms and ultimately the transmission of infectious agents.

[Influence of the COVID-19 pandemia on the ophthalmologic emergency department in the Toulouse University Hospital during the first lockdown from March the 17th to May the 10th of 2020]. / Impact de la pandémie de COVID-19 sur les urgences ophtalmologiques du CHU de Toulouse lors du premier confinement du 17 mars au 10 mai 2020.

INTRODUCTION: We conducted this study to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and the lockdown in France from March 17, 2020 to May 10, 2020, on the ophthalmic emergency department at Toulouse University Hospital, compared to the period from March 2 to March 16, 2020. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study, conducted in the ophthalmic emergency department of Toulouse University Hospital. We included the patients presenting to the emergency department from March 2 to May 10, 2020. We recorded age, sex, day of visit, time until care was received, past ocular history, outpatient or inpatient status, final diagnosis and its severity, outpatient or inpatient disposition, and medical or surgical treatment after the emergency department visit. RESULTS: We found a substantial decrease in the number of patients per day, mostly during the first month of the lockdown: 44 patients per day before the lockdown compared to 23 patients per day during the first month, followed by 38 patients per day for the second month of lockdown; more patients visiting promptly; and elderly patients represented a higher proportion of patients. CONCLUSION: The first lockdown in France due to the COVID-19 pandemic had an impact on the Toulouse ophthalmic emergency department, especially concerning the number of patients per day; this study helps to assess individual behavior in this context of a public health crisis.

Psychosocial support to medical teams in SAMUR-Protection Civile during COVID-19

Summary The COVID-19 pandemic has had an exceptional impact on the health system. The lack of information and resources during the first stage of the outbreak COVID-19 has also meant a change in the way we work and in the way we relate to our relatives, colleagues and, of course, our patients. This traumatic situation, due to its characteristics of total uncertainty, novelty, frequency, and high intensity, made it necessary to develop a new approach to our work, a new psychological approach to the pandemic situation that leads to acute stress, insecurity, unknown consequences, uncertainty about its duration and a desolate future. During the first wave, it was necessary to respond to the new situation. In a first phase, an intervention protocol was created for front-line pre-hospital emergency professionals and a COVID-19 psychological unit was set up in a pandemic hospital in Madrid. In a second phase, emergency actions, their conditioning and possible change due to confinement are analysed;the emotional state of front-line intervention personnel is assessed, comparing the pre- and post-first wave period, and burnout syndrome is studied in the SAMUR-Civil Protection volunteer corps. Résumé La pandémie COVID-19 a eu un impact exceptionnel sur le système de santé. Le manque d’informations et de ressources qui ont été ressentis lors du premier état d’alerte COVID-19 a également signifié un changement dans notre façon de travailler et dans notre façon d’être en relation avec nos proches, nos collègues et, bien sûr, nos patients. Cette situation traumatisante, en raison de ses caractéristiques d’incertitude totale, de nouveauté, de fréquence et de haute intensité, a rendu nécessaire le développement d’une nouvelle approche de notre travail, une nouvelle approche psychologique de la situation pandémique qui a conduit à un stress aigu, une insécurité, des conséquences inconnues, une incertitude sur sa durée et un avenir désastreux. Lors de la première vague, il a fallu réagir à la nouvelle situation. Dans une première phase, un protocole d’intervention a été créé pour les professionnels de l’urgence pré-hospitalière de première ligne et une unité psychologique COVID-19 a été mise en place dans un hôpital pandémique de Madrid. Dans une deuxième phase, les actions d’urgence, leur conditionnement et leur éventuel changement dû au confinement sont analysés;l’état émotionnel du personnel d’intervention de première ligne est évalué, en comparant la période précédant et suivant la première vague, et le syndrome d’épuisement professionnel est étudié dans le corps des volontaires de SAMUR-Protection civile.

Palliative recommendation in the emergency room during the first COVID-19 wave: What are the benefits? A study among emergency physicians

At Paris’ Saint-Louis hospital, the collaboration and organisation of the ER teams and those from the palliative care units was completely transformed, at least for a time, by the brutal arrival of SARS-CoV-2. Faced with the necessity of the moment, and initiated by the mobile palliative care team, the absence of structured exchanges of information was replaced with a daily briefing within the ER hospitalisation unit, with the aim of anticipating a possible request to quantify any patients requiring evaluation and palliative care on-site, as well as accompanying the ER doctors and other medical staff present. Beyond describing the patients taken into care under this system, and the benefits in terms of palliative care, a qualitative study conducted with ER doctors allowed us to evaluate the real and perceived benefits, and to conclude that a greater presence of the mobile accompaniment and palliative care team at ER allows for better use of their resources and a subsequent modification of the care pipeline for certain patients. This work shows the fundamental contribution that a mobile palliative care team can make in receiving and treating ER patients, while also improving the experience of the teams faced daily with individuals at the end of their lives. However, it also brings to light a patent lack of palliative care culture in ER services, as well as the absence of a reflex to make use of this type of expertise systematically, despite the benefits being universally acknowledged, opening the way for the joint development of veritable palliative care for acute cases. © 2022 Elsevier Masson SAS En matière de collaboration entre les équipes d'urgences et celles de soins palliatifs de l'hôpital Saint-Louis (AP–HP, Paris), l'irruption brutale du SARS-CoV-2 et ses conséquences sur l'afflux de patients et l'organisation des soins ont, pour un temps au moins, changé la donne. Contraints par la nécessité du moment, et sous l'impulsion de l’équipe mobile de soins palliatifs, l'absence d’échanges structurés a fait place à un échange quotidien au sein de l'unité d'hospitalisation des urgences afin d'anticiper un éventuel appel, de recenser sur place les patients pouvant bénéficier d'un avis et d'une prise en charge palliatifs, mais également d'accompagner les urgentistes et les soignants présents. Au-delà de la description des patients ainsi pris en charge et du bénéfice en termes de prise en charge palliative, une étude qualitative réalisée auprès des urgentistes nous permet d’évaluer le bénéfice réel et ressenti et d'affirmer qu'une présence renforcée de l'EMASP aux urgences permet une meilleure utilisation de ces ressources et une modification subséquente du parcours de certains patients. Ce travail met en évidence la contribution fondamentale que peut apporter une équipe mobile de soins palliatifs à la prise en charge des patients aux urgences et au mieux-être d’équipes quotidiennement confrontées à la fin de vie. Il fait néanmoins apparaître un défaut patent de culture palliative aux urgences ainsi qu'un manque de réflexe de recours à ce type d'expertise alors que les bénéfices en sont unanimement reconnus, et ouvre ainsi la porte au développement conjoint d'une véritable médecine palliative de l'aigu. © 2022 Elsevier Masson SAS

La médecine d’urgence de la création aux perspectives

Résumé Pour comprendre la crise actuelle des urgences et les solutions que l’on peut y apporter, il est nécessaire de d’analyser les origines de la médecine urgence. Sa dimension pré hospitalière qui est parfois critiquée et décriée est directement issue de la réponse à des crises sanitaires majeures. Sa reconnaissance réglementaire a pris du temps et a fait l’objet de nombreuses discussions avant d’aboutir en 1986 à une loi. Le rapprochement de la composante pré hospitalière et hospitalière de la Médecine d’Urgence a permis la création d’une nouvelle spécialité médicale. Des événements récents, notamment la crise COVID, ont montré l’adaptabilité et l’évolutivité de ce système et sa pertinence. La crise actuelle des urgences fait partie d’un phénomène plus global qui touche tout l’hôpital. De nombreuses solutions existent optimiser aussi bien l’amont, l’aval et l’organisation du service d’accueil des urgences (SAU). Mais, au-delà de ces considérations c’est dans le cadre d’une refonte du système de soins qu’il faut définir un nouveau contrat rassemblant les professionnels et le public, autour de la demande et pas seulement l’offre existante de soins. C’est le meilleur garant d’une utilisation pertinente des ressources de médecine d’urgence aussi bien hospitalières que pré hospitalières. Summary To understand the current emergency care crisis and the solutions that can be brought to it, it is necessary to analyze the origins of emergency medicine. Its pre-hospital dimension, which is sometimes criticized and decried, comes directly from the response to major health crises. Its regulatory recognition took time and was the subject of many discussions before resulting in a law in 1986. Bringing together the pre-hospital and hospital components of Emergency Medicine has led to the creation of a new medical specialty. Recent events, including the COVID crisis, have shown the adaptability and scalability of this system and its relevance. The current emergency crisis is part of a larger phenomenon affecting the entire hospital. Many solutions exist to optimize both upstream, downstream patients flow and the organization of the Emergency Room (ER). But, beyond these considerations, it is within the framework of an overhaul of the healthcare system that a new contract must be defined bringing together professionals and the public, around the demand and not only the existing offer of healthcare. It is the best guarantee of the relevant use of emergency medicine resources, both hospital and pre-hospital.

[Home treatment of low-risk pulmonary embolism patients : Efficacy and safety of an outpatient program including the general practitioner]. / Prise en charge ambulatoire des embolies pulmonaires à risque faible ; expérience d'une filière centrée sur le lien ville-hôpital.

AIM: Outpatient treatment (OT) of patients with low-risk pulmonary embolisms (PE) is recommended. A multidisciplinary OT program including the general practitioner (GP) has been implemented at Versailles hospital in 2019. The objectives of the study were to assess the feasibility, safety and acceptability of the program. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The feasibility of, and the inclusion criteria for OT were defined from a retrospective cohort study of PE patients carried out in 2018. In the prospective study, consecutive patients consulting in the emergency department between 2019 and 2021 with confirmed PE were eligible for OT if they had sPESI and HESTIA scores equal to 0, normal troponin and NT-pro-BNP levels, and no right ventricular dilation on imaging. PEs associated with COVID were excluded. The OT program included 4 appointments within 3 months, including 2 with the GP. Events (death, recurrence of PE or venous thromboembolism, bleeding, rehospitalisation) were collected at 3-month follow-up. RESULTS: In the retrospective study, 19% of the 138 PE patients seen in the emergency department were eligible for OT. No complication occurred at Day 90. In the prospective study, 313 consecutive patients with confirmed PE in the emergency department were included, 66 (21%) were eligible for OT. Overall, 43 patients (14%) received OT (39 eligible) and 27 patients eligible for OT were hospitalised (92% because of pulmonary infarction). At 3-month follow-up, there were no death, no recurrence of thromboembolism, and one patient has been early hospitalised for COVID; 3 female patients treated with rivaroxaban had minor bleeding (heavy menstrual bleeding). The satisfaction rate of general practitioner was 95%. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the feasibility and safety of our OT program for low-risk EP patients, centered on the general practitioner. It reduces the time spent in the emergency department, reduces hospitalisations and strengthens the city-hospital link for care.

Urgences psychiatriques chez les 15–25 ans durant la première année de la crise sanitaire : une étude épidémiologique descriptive dans le plus grand centre d’urgences psychiatriques français

Résumé Depuis le 16 mars 2020, date de l’annonce du premier confinement en France dans le contexte de pandémie liée à la COVID-19 et de crise sanitaire, les Français ont connu un bouleversement brutal et durable de leurs rythmes et habitudes. La crise sanitaire a eu un impact fort sur la population générale et sur les patients souffrant de troubles psychiatriques. La demande de prise en charge en santé mentale est particulièrement accrue chez les jeunes, qui semblent les plus impactés par cette crise. Dans la première partie de cet article, nous décrirons l’impact de la crise sanitaire sur la santé mentale des jeunes et sur la fréquentation des urgences psychiatriques, avec une revue exhaustive de la littérature française et internationale. La littérature traitant de la santé mentale des enfants et des jeunes durant la crise sanitaire est vaste et régulièrement actualisée. Au 31 décembre 2021, seules quelques données concernant l’état de santé mentale des jeunes sont chiffrées et publiées. Dans la seconde partie, nous présenterons une étude épidémiologique descriptive réalisée dans le plus grand centre d’urgences psychiatriques français, afin de mettre en évidence les changements des flux de consultations des patients âgés de 15 à 25 ans durant la première année de la crise sanitaire, comparativement aux trois années précédentes. En conclusion, nous évoquerons les mesures et adaptations du système de soins français mises en place pour prendre en charge les besoins accrus en santé mentale de cette population spécifique des 15–25 ans, particulièrement malmenée par la crise sanitaire, véritable enjeu national de santé publique. Introduction Since March 16, 2020, the date of the announcement of the first confinement in France in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and health crisis, French residents have experienced a brutal and lasting disruption in their rhythms and habits. The health crisis has had a strong impact on the general population and especially on patients suffering from psychiatric disorders. The demand for mental health care has particularly heightened among young people, who seem to be the most affected by this crisis. In the first part of this article, we will describe the impact of the health crisis on the mental health of young people and on the attendance of psychiatric emergencies, with a review of French and international literature. In the second part, we will present a descriptive epidemiological study carried out in the largest French psychiatric emergency center. Methods and objective Our sample included 9,771 young patients from 15 to 25 years old. The main objective of our study is to highlight the changes in the flow of consultations of patients aged 15 to 25 years during the first year of the health crisis, compared to the three previous years. We calculated and compared the proportion of the target population consulting between the period of the first year of the health crisis (COVID period) and the period encompassing the previous three years (pre-COVID period). We also compared different variables, between the 2,179 young people consulting during the first year of COVID-19 health crisis and the 7,592 young people during the three last years: age, sex, marital status, symptoms, environmental context and CIM-10 diagnoses. Results We observed a significant increase in the proportion of patients aged 15 to 25 during the COVID period (n=29.4% vs. 27.6%;P<0,001). The patients during the COVID period were predominantly female. We have seen a significant increase in patients coming for consultations for anxiety (+4.3%;P<0.001), sleep disorders (+2.8%;P<0.001) and suicidal thoughts (+2.7%;P=0.006) during the COVID period. During the first year of the health crisis, the target population consulted less for claustration, withdrawal or odd behavior. Family conflicts, traumatic events and other life events were more frequent. Schizophrenia, schizotypal and delusional disorders were less frequently diagnosed. Conclusion The health crisis has had a considerable impact on the mental health of the youth population. The mental health of young people is a current subject of concern and a major public health issue. Data from the literature warns of the impact of the health crisis on the mental health of this population and the need for early treatment, even as the supply of psychiatric care is decreasing.

Impact of the first lockdown related to the COVID-19 pandemic on ophthalmic emergencies in a French University Hospital.

INTRODUCTION: At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, the French government implemented its first national lockdown between March and May 2020 in order to limit the dissemination of the virus. This historic measure affected patients' daily lives and transportation, resulting in changes in the delivery of medical care, particularly emergency care. This study aimed to assess the impact of this restriction policy on the number and severity of ophthalmic emergencies seen in an ophthalmology emergency department. METHODS: This retrospective study conducted at the regional university Hospital of Tours included all patients presenting to the ophthalmology emergency department over four periods: lockdown (03/16/2020 to 05/10/2020), post-lockdown (05/11/2020 to 06/12/2020) and the two corresponding periods in 2019. The following data were recorded: sex, age, time of visit, reason for visit, diagnosis, severity of emergency graded on the BaSe SCOrE, time from first symptoms until visit, existence of a work-related injury, and referral source (ophthalmologist or other). RESULTS: A total of 1186 and 1905 patients were respectively included during the 2020 lockdown period and the corresponding period in 2019. The study populations for the 2019 and 2020 post-lockdown periods consisted of 1242 and 1086 patients respectively. During the lockdown, the number of consultations decreased significantly (-37.7%), affecting mild and severe emergencies similarly. During the post-lockdown period, the number of emergencies gradually increased but did not reach the level of the corresponding period in 2019 (-12.6%). CONCLUSION: The first French lockdown resulted in a significant decrease in ophthalmic emergency visits, similar for all levels of severity. All age groups were impacted similarly, without the expected exaggerated decrease for patients over 50 years of age, who are considered to be at greater risk for developing a severe form of COVID-19. The post-lockdown period showed a gradual increase in ophthalmic emergency visits, although these remained fewer than the previous year.

[The incidence of hand trauma the COVID-19 epidemic setting]. / L'incidence des traumatismes de la main dans le contexte épidémique COVID-19.

OBJECTIVES: In France, a lockdown was enforced from March 17 to May 11, 2020. It was renewed with different modalities from April 3 to May 3, 2021. Our objective was to compare the epidemiology of hand and wrist trauma injuries during these periods to a control period, with the hypothesis of a decreased incidence of hand and wrist trauma. METHODS: Patients consulting at a trauma emergency center of a university hospital labeled SOS-Mains were included during lockdowns, and were compared with a control group who consulted during an equivalent period in 2019. We retrospectively collected demographic and clinical data in relation to hand and wrist injuries. RESULTS: During lockdowns, there was an increase in these injuries relative to the total number of patients (from 16% to 22% and 18%). We found a decrease during the first lockdown in the number of fractures, amputations, burns, infections, injuries secondary to a work accident and isolated wounds but a significantly higher proportion of tendon and vasculonervous injuries in the first lockdown (12% vs. 4%). CONCLUSIONS: In first lockdown, the incidence of hand and wrist injuries decreased, but there was an increase in tendon and microsurgical injuries. This may be explained by the change in leisure activities. This underlines the importance of preventive measures concerning the risks related to some activities (use of sharp/motorized tools) in this context of health crisis.

Impact of lockdown during the COVID-19 outbreak on ophthalmological emergencies in a referral center in France.

PURPOSE: In March 2020, the sudden rise in the number of SARS-CoV-2 infections in France led the government to impose a strict lockdown during which all non-urgent medical consultations were postponed. From March 17 to May 10, 2020, private medical practices were closed, and telemedicine was encouraged. The consequences on ophthalmic care were dramatic, with over 90% of scheduled consultations canceled. The goal of this study was to describe consultations during the 2-month strict lockdown in Paris and to analyze its impact on the visual outcomes of patients consulting in the ophthalmology emergency department (OED). METHODS: Data of patients who presented to the OED of the A. de Rothschild Foundation Hospital (RFH), a tertiary ophthalmology center in Paris, France, during the lockdown period and its immediate aftermath were analyzed. The results were compared to the same time periods in the years 2018 and 2019. Four time periods were defined and numbered chronologically: March 17 to May 10, 2018 (period 1); March 17 to May 10, 2019 (period 2); March 17 to May 10, 2020 (period 3, the lockdown period); May 11 to June 9, 2020 (period 4, the post-lockdown period). RESULTS: The number of consultations was reduced by more than 50% during the lockdown period (n=2909 patients) and by 30% during the post-lockdown period (n=2622) when compared to periods 1 (n=7125) and 2 (n=8058). Even though LP4 saw an increase in the number of patients consulting, there was no increase in the rate of severe diseases (12.8% during LP3 vs. 11.1% during LP4), and the proportion of patients who were admitted was statistically similar (4.3% vs. 3.6%). Neuro-ophthalmic diseases were the most common during LP3 and LP4. Neovascular glaucoma was twice as common during post-LP4 (P=0.08). We noted a significant increase in patients with graft rejection consulting in our OED during the post-LP4 (P<0.001). These results were likely related to a delay in follow-up consultations due to the lockdown measures. CONCLUSION: The reduction in the number of consultations in our OED during the lockdown period affected both minor emergencies and severe ophthalmic diseases, but with no significant delay in diagnosis. More longitudinal and longer study is needed to confirm this and to retrospectively analyze the effects of the COVID-19 outbreak and lockdown.

Hand injuries treated at a hand emergency center during the COVID-19 lockdown.

The recent coronavirus outbreak has tested the adaptability, cooperation and organizational capabilities of our healthcare systems. Restrictions were implemented in several countries to reduce virus transmission whilst emergency departments (ED) were overwhelmed and there was shortage of healthcare providers. Given this situation and the consequences of hand injuries, we studied the epidemiology of hand injuries in an accredited FESSH emergency center during the lockdown in France (March 17 to May 10, 2020) due to the coronavirus outbreak. During this period, 1947 patients consulted for a hand injury. We found high percentages of men (63%), open wounds (70%), domestic accidents (88%) and surgical treatment being required (76%). There was a significant decrease in admissions and consultations relative to the same period in 2019. This reference data can help healthcare systems prepare for future outbreaks and similar restrictions.

Teleconsultation in primary ophthalmic emergencies during the COVID-19 lockdown in Paris: Experience with 500 patients in March and April 2020.

This prospective observational cohort study is based on the first 500 patients who requested emergency teleconsultation during the initial days of the COVID-19 lockdown in Paris, France between 20 March and 10 April 2020. It is the first study to assess the utility of emergency teleophthalmology with a simple smartphone application or web browser and a webcam to manage emergency eye care in a population with sudden restricted access to ophthalmologists. In this study, every patient who asked for an ophthalmic emergency consultation in a single specialized center in Paris ('SOS Œil') first had to undergo a teleconsultation appointment to evaluate the indication for a physical consultation to preserve lockdown. Under medical advice only, a physical appointment was given within a day (if necessary). The aim of the study was to describe the population and diagnoses and evaluate the main judgment criteria, defined as the 'ability of teleconsultation to properly indicate a physical consultation for fair diagnosis and treatment in eye emergencies'. This organization has permitted physicians and patients to preserve social distancing while avoiding 3 or 4 physical consultations per person. Notably, 27% of teleconsultations were followed by a physical appointment. There was a mean 4.12-day delay between symptom apparition and consultation, and less than 1 day for traumas, superficial corneal foreign body and neuro-ophthalmological emergencies. There was a 96% sensitivity and 95% specificity to properly evaluate the indication of a physical consultation and only 1.0% misdiagnoses that lead to delayed care. Hence, teleconsultation maintained satisfactory healthcare access to patients with severe ophthalmological disorders while preserving social distancing and sanitary precautions. Therefore, teleconsultation may be seriously considered as a way to efficiently regulate ophthalmic emergencies, especially for patients with limited access to a specialist.